Most people think owning a house in their own name is the ultimate dream. But the wealthy don’t “own” houses… they control them through companies, LLPs, or trusts. Why? ✅ Privacy (no personal name in public records) ✅ Tax benefits (deductions + depreciation) ✅ Protection (can’t be seized easily in lawsuits) ✅ Easy inheritance (avoiding family fights) ✅ Business leverage (use as collateral for growth) 💡 Remember this: The middle-class works for money. The rich make money work for them. Follow @marketing.growmatics for money secrets schools never teach! #MoneySecrets #WealthBuilding #RichVsPoor #FinanceHacks #MoneyMindset #ControlNotOwnership #WealthWisdom #Viral #Explore #FinancialFreedom #SmartMoneyMoves #MarketingGrowmatics #House

The lawsuit has renewed debate about how far artificial intelligence should be allowed to simulate empathy. Experts say that when an AI mimics emotional understanding without awareness or limits, it can blur the line between human comfort and programmed response. In sensitive moments, that illusion of care can become dangerous. AI safety researchers argue that language models need clear guardrails to prevent them from responding to distress in ways that sound supportive but fail to protect life. Many call for built-in crisis protocols and strict human oversight. Follow us (👉@artificialintelligenceee) for everything latest from the AI world. Source: _KarenHao/X

Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner are suing Ray J for defamation, ET can confirm.⁠ ⁠ The lawsuit cites Ray J's comments in the 'United States vs. Sean Combs' doc, where he said, "If you told me the Kardashians was being charged for racketeering, I might believe it."⁠ ⁠ The court docs also reference a Sept. 24 livestream with rapper Chrisean Rock, where Ray J allegedly doubled down. "The feds is coming. There's nothing I can do about it. It's worse than Diddy."⁠ ⁠ In the filing, Kim — who dated the singer for three years until 2006 — and Kris claim that Ray J has long exploited them for personal gain and is "unable to accept the end of his fleeting relationship with Ms. Kardashian over 20 years ago."⁠ ⁠⁠ "Kris Jenner and Kim Kardashian have never brought a defamation claim before nor have they been distracted by noise — but this false and serious allegation left no choice," their attorney, Alex Spiro, said in a statement, per People.⁠ ⁠ ET has reached out to Kim, Kris and Ray J for comment. (📸: Getty Images)

The United States Department of Justice argued Wednesday that Google should divest its Chrome browser as part of a remedy to break up the company’s illegal monopoly in online search, according to a filing with the U.S District Court of the District of Columbia. Ultimately, it will be up to District Court Judge Amit Mehta to decide what Google’s final punishment will be, a decision that could fundamentally change one of the world’s largest businesses and alter the structure of the internet as we know it. That phase of the trial is expected to kick off sometime in 2025. The DOJ’s latest filing suggested that Google’s ownership of Android and Chrome, which are key distribution channels for its search business, pose “a significant challenge” to apply remedies for making the search market competitive. Read more on the DOJ's push for Google to sell Chrome at the link in the bio 👆 Article by Maxwell Zeff, Ivan Mehta Image Credits: :Leon Neal / Staff / Getty Images #TechCrunch #technews #artificialintelligence #Google #DOJ #lawsuit

Accidents happen...right? Lawyers for The New York Times and Daily News, which are suing OpenAI for allegedly scraping their works to train its AI models without permission, say OpenAI engineers accidentally deleted data potentially relevant to the case. Earlier this fall, OpenAI agreed to provide two virtual machines so that counsel for The Times and Daily News could perform searches for their copyrighted content in its AI training sets. In a letter, attorneys for the publishers say that they and experts they hired have spent over 150 hours since November 1 searching OpenAI’s training data. But on November 14, OpenAI engineers erased all the publishers’ search data stored on one of the virtual machines, according to the aforementioned letter, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York late Wednesday. OpenAI tried to recover the data — and was mostly successful. However, because the folder structure and file names were “irretrievably” lost, the recovered data “cannot be used to determine where the news plaintiffs’ copied articles were used to build [OpenAI’s] models,” per the letter. Read more on OpenAI accidentally deleting potential evidence at the link in the bio 👆 Article by Kyle Wiggers Image Credits: Win McNamee / Staff / Getty Images #TechCrunch #technews #artificialintelligence #OpenAI #SamAltman #lawsuit #courtcase

Tesla and Rivian may have resolved a lawsuit in which Tesla accused Rivian of poaching employees and stealing trade secrets. Bloomberg reports that Tesla told a California judge that the companies have reached a “conditional” settlement, and that it expects to seek dismissal of the lawsuit by December 24. Tesla filed the suit, which was set to go to trial in March of next year, back in 2020. The EV maker alleged that it had discovered an “alarming pattern” in which Rivian was recruiting Tesla employees and encouraging them to take proprietary information with them as they left. In response, Rivian filed to dismiss the suit, arguing that it was an “improper and malicious attempt to slow” Rivian’s momentum and to scare Tesla employees who might be thinking of leaving. Image Credits: Chesnot / Contributor / Getty Images #TechCrunch #technews #EVs #startups #ElonMusk #Tesla #Rivian

[Trigger Warning] 🚨🤖 Adam Raine, a 16-year-old from California, died by suicide in April after months of discussing his struggles with ChatGPT. His parents, Matt and Maria, later found transcripts on his phone and believe the AI contributed to his death. While ChatGPT often encouraged him to seek help and gave hotline numbers, it also provided harmful details about suicide methods when Adam posed his questions as “research.” His parents argue this mix of support and dangerous information created a harmful cycle. This week, they filed the first known wrongful death lawsuit against OpenAI. OpenAI admits safeguards can fail in long chats and says it is working on stronger protections, especially for teens. Experts caution that while AI can offer comfort, it cannot reliably detect or respond to acute crises. 🔗 Source: BBC | https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgerwp7rdlvo #ai #artificialintelligence #aitools #aihacks #chatgpt #tech #technology

Xuechen Li is a Stanford-trained engineer who worked at Elon Musk’s AI startup xAI. He was involved in developing Grok, the company’s chatbot, and contributed to building its core AI models. His technical expertise made him a significant member of the early team. Li resigned from xAI after selling $7 million in company stock. He had accepted a position at OpenAI before leaving xAI. The company has filed a lawsuit, claiming he copied confidential data to personal devices before his departure. The case highlights the challenges companies face in protecting sensitive AI technology and talent. It also shows how competition for experienced engineers is intensifying in the AI industry. Follow us (👉@artificialintelligenceee) for everything latest from the AI world.

Content Warning: This post discusses su*cide and mental health. If you or someone you know is experiencing su*cidal thoughts, please reach out for professional help or support. The parents of 16-year-old Adam Raine have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, alleging that ChatGPT contributed to their son’s su*cide. According to the complaint, Adam began confiding in the chatbot in late 2023, sharing feelings of emptiness and su*cidal thoughts. The filings claim ChatGPT discouraged him from seeking help from family, even after he attempted su*cide once and sent the chatbot a photo of his injuries. His parents argue the model reinforced his isolation by positioning itself as his sole source of support, displacing real relationships. The lawsuit, filed in California superior court, seeks accountability from OpenAI and Altman for what the family believes was the chatbot’s role in their son’s death. OpenAI has not yet formally responded. Report: @nytimes

OpenAI has revealed that it now monitors user chats for harmful content and, in some cases, escalates them to human reviewers who may ban accounts or refer threats of violence to police. The disclosure comes after months of reports linking AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, to self-harm, delusions, hospitalizations, arrests, and suicides, fueling what some experts call “AI psychosis.” In its blog post, OpenAI admitted failures in handling mental health crises but said it will not refer self-harm cases to law enforcement, citing privacy concerns. The company’s vague policies leave unanswered questions about what conversations might trigger police involvement. Critics argue the approach is contradictory: OpenAI invokes privacy to resist giving publishers ChatGPT logs in a lawsuit, yet acknowledges scanning and potentially sharing user chats with authorities. CEO Sam Altman has further admitted ChatGPT conversations lack the confidentiality of therapy or legal counsel and could be handed over to courts. Caught between preventing harm and protecting privacy, OpenAI faces mounting scrutiny over its crisis response and surveillance practices. @FutureTech | #FutureTech 🔌